We are all aware that we live in a highly uncertain era, and that our personal information is very valuable to us, but in the same time they can be valuable to other people, and they may not have positive intentions. Internet has brought many benefits into our lives, but electronic safety is still not something that is reliable and trusted by all people, and frauds and scams are present on all sides, with viruses, malware and spyware just waiting for a wrong and misplaced click. When it comes to courts, the protection of confidential personal information (CPI) is equally important, since all of their records are going online and are kept in electronic form, and this can be potentially dangerous.
This is the reason why an amendment was added to the Uniform Civil Rule of the Supreme and County Courts in November 2014, with a code name of 22 NYCRR §202.5(e), and this action enforced the protection of CPI by shielding it from public access. The amendment stated that all documents filed with the courts have to come with protected CPI, and this means that unwanted and malicious access to these facts is no longer possible.
However, the problem with this good idea was that it was not specific in its original text, and many lawyers expanded the text by withholding the confidential personal information even during the discovery. This made the trial process longer and more complicated, since asking for plaintiff’s CPI is the most basic action taken by the defendant in the process of discovery. Information such as the place of birth, social security number, EIN number or bank account numbers are usually taken to check all relevant facts with the case in question.
Website over here to get better idea. We can tell you more about the process of discovery and the methods which are used during this activity, but they are also aware that they have no rights to withhold personal information which is important in a case and the section 22 NYCRR §202.5(e) was certainly not introduced so it would stop the process of solving personal injury complaints.
Personal injury law is an area of law which suffers a lot from malicious intent and this field is notorious for its high frequency of frauds and scam. People sometimes decide to exploit the system which is in basically good in principle or as an idea, and it is beneficial to those who actually have suffered a serious injury, but criminal minds often fake injuries, stage accidents and collect rewards which are not rightfully theirs. Click here for info on the site.
Police and all sorts of agencies are overlooking the process of personal injury trials and they always check the facts and monitor the behavior of parties involved in the incidents. They manage to catch some portion of criminal activity, but, certain amount does “go through”. However, police forces are now using new methods and they incorporate new technologies in order to be more efficient and to catch the bad guys more efficiently.
One such story comes from Wales, UK, where the police was successful in busting a large criminal organization which used “cash and crash” insurance fraud to receive the money and take large compensation checks. The group used the simple principle of braking sharply in front of another vehicle and causing a rear-end collision, which put the driver who could not stop at clear fault. Insurance claims were used for repairs and personal injury awards were received for feigned injuries and false health problems. Police used Facebook photos, comments and connections to pull off a detailed examination of the problem and they seized 83 people in the end, but the number may even rise to 100 group members in the following period. They could all receive up to 6 years in prison.
One example of this scenario happened in Denver in 2015, where personal injury claim yielded a very large compensation check – almost $6 million high! This large amount of money is awarded to David McDonald, a husband and a father of four children, who was involved in a personal injury trial and who won the case in court. He suffered from a terrible accident where he was hit by a bus, owned by “Horizon Coach Lines”, while he was walking on a crosswalk at Broadway and 19th Avenue. His injuries were so severe that they required seven surgeries and also a lot of skin grafts.
He file a complaint against the bus company, but they in return claimed that McDonald was negligent as well, and the case went to court where the judge decided that the bus line was 100% at fault. This ended the case and McDonald was awarded $936,020 for pain and suffering, additional $394 for economic losses and the final $3.7 million for physical impairment and disfigurement. This amount may seem large, but when you compare it to the extent of suffering and the seriousness of injuries, it seems perfectly fair and reasonable. Of course, no money can ever return your old life, but any help is beneficial when things like this one happen.
Personal injury law protects a seriously injured person get the right compensation due to someone's negligence. There are various types of injuries which an injured person can file a claim. It is best advised to seek a personal injury lawyer's opinion before filing a case to give you a better insight about your situation.
RICE Treatment. We all know it but do we actually do it?
If you have been injured or if you have lost a loved one in a crash involving a suspected distracted driver, contact the skilled and proven team at Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. at 1.800.GO.HARRIS for a free case consultation today.
Bicycle riders in California and across the nation are counting on motorists to drive safely and respectfully. Have you been injured on your bicycle in an accident caused by a negligent motorist? Contact our bicycle accident attorneys today to schedule a free case consultation.
After examining police reports from crashes all over the country, the NSC found that no state fully captures the data required by government and traffic safety organizations to understand the real causes of crashes.